, 2006), and data are fit to equations representing a theoretical model associated with Selleck SCR7 the function under study (e.g., the Michaelis–Menten equation for concentration dependence or Arrhenius equation for temperature dependence). Before computers were readily available, it had been common to first linearize the equation in question, and then conduct a linear root mean square regression (Calcutt and Boddy, 1983 and Skoog et al., 1998) to find the parameters of the model (Segal, 1975). As discussed below (Figure 1) this can lead to erroneous

error propagation, and now that computers and programs that conduct non-linear regressions are readily available, it is always important to conduct non-linear regression to the model under study. Errors that are introduced during the experimental measurement must be propagated throughout the data analysis in order for valid conclusions to be drawn

from the study. Fitting the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation, for example, will have errors associated with kcat, Km and kcat/Km. In a non-competitive assay this will result in individual errors for both the light and heavy isotope that must be propagated when calculating the KIEs using the equations in Table 1. Since multiple measurements have to be made, the final error must be propagated when reporting the KIEs on the different parameters. When measuring KIEs as a function of pH, temperature, pressure, fraction conversion, etc., the errors associated with the individual experiments must be carried over to the fits of the

Dolutegravir research buy data to the relevant equations. The errors from these fits must be reported when presenting the final fits of the data to obtain the isotope effects reported in the study. The procedures for propagating and reporting errors for KIE data are illustrated C-X-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CXCR-7) in the examples presented below. Before the widespread availability of software packages that conduct non-linear regression, the kinetic parameters of an enzyme were commonly determined through a linear root mean square regression. Common examples for these procedures included plotting 1/[vo] versus 1/[S] (i.e. Lineweaver–Burk plots), constructing Eisenthal, Cornish-Bowden plots where [S] is plotted on the negative abscissa and vo is plotted on the ordinate, or Hanes–Woolf plots in which the [S]/vo is plotted against [S], where vo is the initial velocity and [S] is the substrate concentration, respectively ( Cook and Cleland, 2007, Cornish-Bowden, 2012 and Segal, 1975). While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, linear regressions of kinetic data result in an erroneous weighing of errors and as a consequence the value and uncertainty of the determined KIE as illustrated in Figure 1 for a hypothetical Lineweaver–Burk plot. As extensively described elsewhere (Cook and Cleland, 2007, Cornish-Bowden, 2012 and Segal, 1975), the Michaelis–Menten equation (Eq. (2)) can be linearized as shown in Eq.