Both substances are known to possess excellent antimicrobial

activities. CHX is a cationic bis-biguanide with good efficacy against several gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria found in endodontic infections 7 and 8. Its antibacterial effects are likely to be related to the induction of damage to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and precipitation of I-BET-762 order intracellular constituents (31). Although some may claim for higher concentrations of CHX, in vitro antibacterial studies suggest that even lower concentrations may perform equally well (8); 0.12% CHX is widely used as a mouthrinse and has good tissue compatibility (32). Further studies are required to evaluate whether a higher concentrated CHX solution may offer better clinical performance. NaOCl has a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, rapidly killing vegetative and spore-forming bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses (33). Candidate endodontic pathogens are highly susceptible to NaOCl 7 and 8. This substance purportedly exerts its antibacterial effect by inducing the irreversible oxidation of sulfhydryl groups of essential bacterial enzymes but may also have deleterious effects on bacterial DNA and membrane-associated activities (31). The choice for a 2.5% NaOCl solution was based on the fact that

no significant differences in intracanal antibacterial effects have been observed when comparing it with higher NaOCl concentrations (4). Antimicrobial effectiveness is surely the most important property required for an irrigant solution to be used during treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. The Selleckchem SCH772984 results of the present clinical study show that, from a microbiological point of view,

it makes no difference to use NaOCl or CHX. This is further reinforced by the findings that both NaOCl and CHX exhibit no significant effects on LPS (16). Therefore, other properties should then be considered when choosing one or the other as the irrigant. CHX but not NaOCl has Staurosporine datasheet substantivity to dentin, which provides CHX with residual antimicrobial effects for days to weeks 34 and 35. However, NaOCl but not CHX possesses a soft-tissue–dissolving ability, which may help clean the root canal (6). To take advantage of the properties of both substances, some authors have recommended a combined use, with NaOCl being used throughout instrumentation followed by a final rinse with CHX, and good results have been reported in terms of negative bacterial cultures (36). Although an overall significant reduction in bacterial levels occurred after chemomechanical preparation, 18 of 30 (60%) cases treated with NaOCl and 9 of 17 (53%) irrigated with chlorhexidine were still positive for the presence of bacteria as detected by broad-range PCR. These molecular findings are very similar to those of a previous culture study that reported positive cultures in 62.5% and 50% of the cases treated with NaOCl and CHX, respectively (15).