Emery et al. [7] reported that treatment with GLM suppressed joint destruction significantly 52 weeks after the start of treatment, and further long-term observation is needed. However, due to the short follow-up period in our analysis, such observation was not possible. In the present analysis, there were no serious adverse events LSD1 inhibitor inhibitor arising from the use of GLM, although deterioration in renal function was reported in two patients.
An association with the development of malignant tumors has been suggested with GLM, and further clinical confirmation is warranted [20]. However, long-term observation of the patients in our study is needed before any definite conclusions can be made.
It is important to select a type of biological agent Salubrinal ic50 taking into account the lifestyle of individual patients. Despite reported problems with pain and administration site reactions, Selleck Combretastatin A4 subcutaneous injection of drugs offers greater convenience than intravenous infusion, which requires physical immobilization for many hours at a hospital, and a longer dosing interval is also advantageous. Because GLM contains only small amounts of stimulating acidic additives and requires only a small volume of dosing solution, reported incidences of pain and administration site reactions are low [14]. 5 Conclusion In the present analysis, GLM plus MTX or GLM monotherapy used in clinical practice in Japanese patients with RA was confirmed to have high effectiveness ZD1839 solubility dmso and safety, comparable with existing biological agents. Thus, we conclude that GLM is a promising new alternative for the treatment of RA in Japanese patients showing poor response, those in whom the use of other biological agents is contraindicated, and cases where the use of MTX in combination with biological
agents is difficult. Acknowledgments Technical editing and manuscript styling was provided by Andrea Bothwell and post-submission editorial assistance was provided by Mary Hines, inScience Communications, Springer Healthcare, with funding provided by Janssen, Japan. Conflict of Interest The author has no conflicts of interest to declare. Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. References 1. Agarwal SK. Biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: an update for managed care professionals. J Manag Care Pharm. 2011;17(9 Suppl B):S14–8. 2. Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, et al. 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.