J Electrochem Soc 1990,137(11):3612–3625.CrossRef 13. Torii A, Sasaki M, Hane K, Okuma S: A method for determining the spring constant of cantilevers for atomic force microscopy.
Meas Sci Technol 1996, 7:179–184.CrossRef 14. Bhushan B: Nano- to microscale wear and mechanical characterization using scanning probe microscopy. Wear 2001, 251:1105–1123.CrossRef 15. Johnson KL: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1985.CrossRef 16. Vandeperre LJ, Giuliani F, Lloyd SJ, Clegg WJ: The hardness of silicon and CB-839 solubility dmso germanium. Acta Mater 2007,55(18):6307–6315.CrossRef 17. Yu BJ, Li XY, Dong HS, Chen YF, Qian LM, Zhou ZR: Towards a deeper understanding of the formation of friction-induced hillocks on monocrystalline BVD-523 price silicon. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2012, 45:145301.CrossRef 18. Yu BJ, Qian LM, Dong HS, Yu JX, Zhou ZR: Friction-induced hillocks on monocrystalline silicon in atmosphere and in vacuum. Wear 2010, 268:1095–1102.CrossRef 19. Song CF, Li XY, Yu BJ, Dong HS, Qian LM, Zhou ZR: Friction-induced nanofabrication method to produce protrusive nanostructures on quartz. Nanoscale Res Lett 2011, 6:310.CrossRef
20. Guo J, Song CF, Li XY, Yu BJ, Dong HS, Qian LM, Zhou ZR: Fabrication mechanism of friction-induced selective etching on Si(100) surface. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7:152.CrossRef 21. Stempflé P, Takadoum J: Multi-asperity nanotribological behavior of single-crystal silicon: crystallography-induced anisotropy in friction and wear. Tribol Int 2012, 48:35–43.CrossRef 22. Powell MJ, Wehrspohn RB, Deane SC: Nature of metastable and stable dangling bond defects
in hydrogenated amorphous silicon. J Non-Cryst Solids 2002, 299–302:556–560.CrossRef 23. Hesketh PJ, Ju C, Gowda S, Zanoria E, Danyluk S: Surface free energy model of silicon anisotropic etching. J Electrochem Soc 1993,140(4):1080–1085.CrossRef 24. Elwenspoek M: On the mechanism of anisotropic etching of silicon. J Electrochem Soc 1993,140(7):2075–2080.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions BY finished the fabrication experiments and acquired the original data in this article. LQ has made substantial contributions to conception and HSP90 design for this article. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background With the growing interest in spin-based quantum computation and spintronic applications [1], there is an increasing need to understand and accurately determine critical parameters of the electron spin degree of freedom. It is well established that when measuring an electron spin in an external magnetic field B, it can either align parallel to or antiparallel to B. The energy difference between these two discrete states, also known as the spin gap or Zeeman splitting, is given by gμ B B where g is the Lande Z-VAD-FMK molecular weight g-factor and μ B is the Bohr magneton.