Only 52% receive three doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DPT). Further, India spends woefully little on routine immunization [52]. Against this backdrop, critics have argued that India’s first priority should be ensuring access to inexpensive UIP vaccines Selleck MDV3100 by the poor [7]. On the other hand, public debate on India’s poor immunization performance is also lacking. The economists raising this issue have further pointed out the futility of public interventions until children reach school going age, although the first two years of life have a decisive and lasting influence on child’s health, well-being,

aptitude and opportunities. While explaining such situation, they use the analogy of a gardener allowing anyone to trample on flowers in his garden and later KPT-330 chemical structure trying to rectify the neglect by giving the plants extra care and heavy doses of water and fertilizer [53]. In any vaccine policy discussion, economic issues play major role [54]. Those opposing introduction of rotavirus vaccine in India’s UIP highlighted that the number needed to be vaccinated for preventing one death and the cost incurred in doing so would considerably exceed per capita

income in India, if vaccines produced by multinational companies are used [55]. Furthermore, external financial assistance over a limited period of time extended to the developing countries like India for introducing newer vaccines have been mentioned by this group as a way to lure these countries into a ‘debt-trap’ [56]. Development of indigenous [57] and low-cost (∼INR 180 for 3 doses/child) [8] Rotavac blunts the above arguments. Regarding economic burden, one study pegged the direct hospitalization related costs to

families to be between INR 1530 and 3130 [58]. Another reports that the median direct medical costs due aminophylline to rotavirus hospitalization in India varies from INR 1800 to 4300 (dependent on the level of care) while the overall economic burden due to rotavirus in India has been calculated in the range of INR 2–3.4 billion [22]. Considering the above figures, it has been projected that a rotavirus vaccination program in India, even at 50% efficacy, would prevent around 44,000 deaths, 293,000 hospitalizations and 328,000 outpatient visits annually, and would save the national exchequer more than US$ 20 million (∼INR 860 million) per year (as per 2008 rates) in the cost of medical treatment [59]. In order to predict the economic impact of introducing rotavirus vaccine in the national immunization program in India, researchers considered factors such as disease burden, vaccine efficacy and vaccine cost. Two studies [59] and [60] reaching similar conclusions envisaged that rotavirus vaccine would likely be a good investment in the country. Rheingans et al. [61] raised the issues of distributional effects and equity concerns. Their work revealed that the Indian states with the lowest cost effectiveness ratio (CER) – a favorable situation – are those with high pre-vaccination mortality.