PubMedCrossRef Authors’ contributions IUR performed the experimen

PubMedCrossRef Authors’ contributions IUR performed the experiments, analysed the data and drafted Maraviroc molecular weight the manuscript. MH assisted with the drafting of the manuscript. FH conceived the study, contributed to the experimental design, co-ordinated data analysis and assisted with the drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Dengue infection is an important mosquito-borne viral infection in areas where mosquitoes breed under optimal conditions. As a member of the family Falviviridae, the dengue virus is transmitted to human via Aedes genus,

especially Aedes agypti. This family also includes Hepatitis C Virus, West Nile Virus and Yellow Fever Virus. Dengue virus has four serotypes DEN 1-4. Sequencing of dengue viral RNA has further verified strain variation within a serotype allowing viruses to be classified into genetically distinct groups within serotypes called genotypes. This virus is prevalent in areas of Asia, Africa, Central and South America [1, 2] . Dengue viral infection can either cause dengue fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) or dengue CHIR-99021 nmr shock syndrome (DSS). The classical dengue fever is mild,

febrile illness which usually results after primary infection with dengue virus. In other cases DF can lead to DHF or DSS which can be life threatening [3, 4]. Infection with a different serotype can show severe outcome due to antibody dependent enhancement [2, 5] and can be a risk factor for DHF and DSS [2, 6–8]. Though dual infection with dengue virus is attributed to cause onset Selleck Forskolin of severe disease [9–11] but a case of mild disease due to dual infection was documented in Brazil in 2003 [9]. Outcome of disease may also depend upon the genotype involved. Some genotypes induce greater viremia and are transmitted more readily, thereby having a higher potential to cause large epidemic [12, 13]. Timely

and correct diagnosis is very critical for patient management as no definitive vaccine has been developed against all dengue virus serotypes. Methods are being employed for diagnosing the dengue virus infection like viral isolation techniques, serological methods and molecular methods. Viral isolation methods are time consuming and usually take a week [2, 14]. Use of serological methods by detecting viral anti-IgM anti-IgG can give false positive results due to extensive antigenic cross-reactivity among flavivirus as well as between different dengue virus serotypes [2, 15–17]. Different types of polymerase chain reactions (PCR) like reverse -transcription PCR (RT-PCR), real-time PCR and nested or hemi-nested PCR are used for detecting genomic sequence for serotyping. Use of PCR techniques is a quick and sensitive method for detecting dengue virus and has replaced viral isolation techniques [2, 18]. Several outbreaks due to the dengue virus infection have been reported from Pakistan [19–26].

Comments are closed.