RNA was

isolated from CD4+ T cells by using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). cDNA synthesis involved Enhanced Avian HS RT-PCR (Sigma-Aldrich). CD40L and β-actin cDNA levels were determined Selleck PD0325901 using Light Cycler-based kinetic quantitative PCR (Roche Diagnostics), and PCR product detection involved Light-Cycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche Diagnostics). CD40L expression was normalised to that of β-actin. Amplification primer sequences were for CD40L (forward) 5′-CACCCCCTGTTAACTGCCTA-3 and (reverse) 5′- CTGGATGTCTGCATCAGTGG-3′; and β-actin (forward) 5′-GCT GTG CTA CGT CGC CCT-3′ and (reverse) 5′-AAG GTA GTT TGG TGG ATG CC-3′. Each sample was analysed in duplicate. After CD4+ T cell isolation, DNA was isolated using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), bisulphite treated with the EpiTect Bisulfite Kit (Qiagen) and then stored at −20 °C. Pyrosequencing was used for quantitative assessment of the methylation level at each studied CpG dinucleotide [9]. Briefly, methylation data were analysed using pyro q-cpg software (Qiagen). The degree of methylation at each CpG was expressed as proportion of methylated cytosines to total LBH589 cell line methylated

and unmethylated cytosines at the respective CpG. Non-CpG cytosines were used as a control to verify completeness of bisulphite conversion. Each sample was processed in duplicate. Eight CpG dinucleotides were analysed within the promoter region and four CpG dinucleotides within the downstream enhancer. CD40L promoter and downstream

enhancer methylation patterns in CD4+ T cells were compared for patients with pSS and controls. CpG positions were the same as those found differentially methylated in SLE [2]. Data are presented as mean percentage methylation. Statistical analyses involved use of GraphPad Prism 5. Differences between patients and controls were analysed by the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test. Relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. To adjust for age between patients and controls, we used ANCOVA. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Characteristics of women with pSS and controls are in Table 1. Median ESSDAI was 2 [0–18]; patients and controls differed by age (56 ± 15.4 versus Progesterone 41 ± 14.6, P < 0.05). We used flow cytometry to investigate CD40L expression on CD4+ T cells ex vivo and after 4 days of culture followed by PMA/ionomycin stimulation for 4 h. Ex vivo expression of CD40L was not detectable among both patients with pSS and controls. After 4 h of PMA and ionomycin stimulation, membrane-bound CD40L expression was higher on CD4+ T cells from patients with pSS than controls (n = 20): the mean MFI was 3,758 (95%CI: 2,636–4,879) versus 2,344 (1,512–3,177), respectively (P = 0.0167) (Fig. 1). Conversely, CD40L mRNA level in CD4+ T cells did not differ between patients and controls, either ex vivo or after 4-day culture with 4-h PMA and ionomycin stimulation (Fig. 2).