When asked which model they would prefer to use in the future, five educators stated they would use a ‘flexible peer-assisted learning’ model, four indicated they would return to a traditional model (but still in pairs), and four did not answer. There was no difference in the learning activities that students were exposed to in the areas of clinician observation, working without observation, receiving individual feedback, participating in team meetings, time observed by the educator, administration and statistics. In the peer-assisted

learning model there was more time spent by students observing their peers perform a Forskolin manufacturer full assessment and treatment, and engaging in specific, facilitated peer interactions. Students received more verbal and written feedback in the peer-assisted learning model. There was also more time spent click here in family meetings in the peer-assisted learning model; however, this was reported by a relatively small number of participants. Five of the six pre-determined elements of the peer-assisted learning model were performed significantly more often in the peer-assisted learning placement, indicating adherence to the trial protocol (Table 6). On completion of both models, students reported increased stress and reduced satisfaction with

the peer-assisted learning model (Table 7). When asked to rate on a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), students reported no difficulty providing or receiving feedback from a peer. They had a neutral response regarding the value of their contributions to their peers’ learning and to the value of their peers’ feedback on their own learning.

Students had a neutral-to-negative response about the value of the contribution the elements of the peer-assisted learning model made to their learning, with the exception of the clinical educator feedback book (Table 8). When asked which model they would prefer to use in the future, 81% students indicated that they preferred the traditional model to the peer-assisted Phosphoprotein phosphatase learning model. Only one student reported an instance where they received conflicting knowledge, feedback or advice from the supervisor and peer, which did not adversely alter the outcome of the placement. One student sought assistance from the university unit co-ordinator over the duration of the study. The student was undertaking the traditional model at the time of the request for assistance. This study is the first randomised trial to investigate a peer-assisted learning model in the allied health sciences in a clinical education setting, and one of few randomised controlled trials to examine clinical education outcomes. The peer-assisted learning model produced similar student performance outcomes compared with a traditional approach. A recent randomised controlled trial investigating the use of simulation in clinical education also found comparable student outcomes across different models of clinical education.