86 A W−1 and QE of approximately 7.1 × 102%) [40],

CdTe nanoribbons (R λ of approximately 7.8 × 102 A W−1 and QE of approximately 2.4 × 105%) [38], ZnSe nanobelts (R λ of approximately see more 0.12 A W−1 and QE of approximately 37.2%) [10], CdS nanoribbons (R λ of approximately 39.5 A W−1 and QE of approximately 1.0 × 104%) [11], and WS2 nanotubes (R λ of approximately 3.14 A W−1 and QE of approximately 615%) [41]. The R λ dependence on the light intensity is shown in Figure 3c. The dependence of QE on the light intensity is also plotted, as shown in Figure 3d. This logarithmic plot shows that the relation of QE of approximately P −0.77 fits the power law. Figure 3 The photoresponse properties of middle-infrared photodetector based on InSb nanowire. (a) I-V curve of an InSb nanowire under irradiation of light with different intensities. (b) Dependence of photocurrent on light intensity and the selleck inhibitor fitted curve using the power law. (c) Dependence of responsivity on light intensity. (d) Dependence of quantum efficiency on light intensity and the fitted curve using the power law. This work finds that R λ and QE decrease with increasing light intensity. The reductions of R λ and QE are strong manifestations of a hole trap at a relatively high light intensity. Under illumination, the photogenerated

holes were trapped by the oxygen ions, and the

electrons contributed selleckchem to the photocurrent. However, the saturation of the electron is trap at high light intensity, reducing the number of available hole traps because of the increasing recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [38, 42]. Sorafenib research buy Furthermore, the onset of electron–hole pair recombination at a high light intensity might also contribute to the shortening of the carrier lifetime. The sensitivity and response speed determine whether a photodetector can feasibly perform as an optical switching device. Therefore, a fast response speed is also a crucial concern. However, the response speed is proportional to the carrier lifetime [43]. The time-dependent photoresponse of the InSb nanowire at light intensities of 508 mW cm-2 was measured by periodically switching on and off at a bias of 9 V, as shown in Figure 4a. The photocurrent exhibits a good, clear, and stable variation. Furthermore, the photocurrent recovered swiftly to its original value when the illumination ceased. The photocurrent-to-dark current ratio (I on/I off) increases from 177% to 571% when the light intensity increases from 0.49 to 508 mW cm−2, as shown in Figure 4b. Figure 4c and d illustrates the time constants for the response (rise) and the recovery (decay) edges at different light intensities, respectively.