Based on this premise trees were midpoint rooted. Of the 114 analyzed colonies of Solenopsis (59 of S. invicta, 40 of S. saevissima, 9 of S. geminata, 4 of S. megergates, 2 of S. pusillignis) from the southern, southeastern, northern, northeastern, and west-central Brazil, 58 (51%) were infected with the endosymbiont Wolbachia, and 13% had multiple infections. All wsp sequences generated in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database under access numbers HM747138 to HM747161. Table 1 presents the species identified by COI, the collecting sites, the presence/absence of Wolbachia infection, and the Wolbachia Everolimus cell line strains found. The sequences
H10, H17, H28, and H38 were not included in the analysis, as they generated proteins that were not similar to those of other sequences and therefore
could be represent errors in the sequencing. Wolbachia infections were found in four of five species of Solenopsis examined (S. invicta, S. saevissima, S. geminata, and S. megergates). The frequency of Wolbachia infections were highest in S. invicta, with 33 infected colonies (22%), while in S. saevissima, S. megergates, and S. geminata, 19 (47%), 4 (100%), 2 (22%), colonies were infected, respectively. Table 2 and Table 3 present the type of Wolbachia supergroup (A or B) in each ant species examined, and by region, respectively. Supergroup B was more commonly found in S. invicta, with 27 strains ( Table 2). The number of variants found in the remaining species was low. In Table 3, the highest incidence was observed in populations from southern (with 21 strains) and southeastern (16 strains) Brazil. The supergroup B was the most frequent, with BIBF 1120 solubility dmso 15 strains found in southern areas and 10 strains in southeastern Brazil. The infection rate was lower in the remaining regions. Low infection rates were found in the northern region, while in central-western and northwestern Brazil, no nests were found to be infected with
Wolbachia. Ninety-one sequences of the wsp gene were generated and analyzed along with sequences of strains retrieved from GenBank (presented in Table 4) using the software NETWORK4.5 to generate a network of strains ( Fig. 2). The resulting network revealed the existence of 46 variants of the wsp next gene in the populations examined. From these 46 variants, 35 were present in the populations surveyed. Some strains were very abundant in the samples and were named H1 and H4 (supergroup A), H23/H26 and H43 (supergroup B). After alignment, the strength of the phylogenetic signal was measured using the software DAMBE (Xia and Xie, 2001). The results indicated a strong phylogenetic signal, with transitions exceeding transversions (Fig. 3). The result of the phylogenetic analysis of Wolbachia strains based on the wsp gene is summarized in Fig. 4. A total of 483 characters were used in the maximum parsimony analysis, 267 were constant and 182 were parsimony-informative characters.